Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Angry judge revokes Lindsay Lohan probation

LOS ANGELES | Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:47pm EDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A angry Los Angeles judge on Wednesday revoked the probation for Lindsay Lohan because she failed to perform community service, and admonished the troubled actress for failing to treat her sentence seriously.

At a progress hearing for Lohan, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Stephanie Sautner called her previous ruling of probation on a theft charge a "gift" and told Lohan, "there's something called looking a gift horse in the mouth."

Lohan's attorney Shawn Chapman Holley tried in vain to argue that her client had complied substantially with other portions of Judge Sautner's sentence, including psychological counseling and attendance in a program for shoplifters.

But Judge Sautner said she was troubled that Lohan had "blown off" her order to work at a downtown Los Angeles women's detention center and had, instead, been reassigned by officials to work in a Red Cross program without court approval.

"Nobody has the power to change my sentence," Judge Sautner said in the hearing, then later pronounced, "I am revoking her probation."

Lohan, 25, was led away from the courtroom in handcuffs, but was expected to post bail and not spend time behind bars. She was ordered to appear at a November 2 hearing set by Sautner at which court officials and attorneys will present evidence as to whether Lohan did, in fact, violate her probation. If so, she could be returned to jail.

Earlier this year, Judge Sautner sentenced the actress to 360 hours community service as part of a sentence for stealing a gold necklace from a jewelry store. The "Mean Girls" actress also served 35 days under house arrest.

The actress' once promising movie career has been derailed by multiple trips to jail and rehab since 2007.

(Reporting by Bob Tourtellotte; Editing by Jill Serjeant)



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement

Jackson trial expert: Propofol safe in right setting

LOS ANGELES | Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:32pm EDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - An authority on the drug propofol testified at the trial of Michael Jackson's doctor on Wednesday that he wants to dispel fears about the anesthetic that led to the pop star's 2009 death.

Dr. Steven Shafer, regarded as one of the leading researchers in the use of propofol, said that propofol, which is normally used to sedate patients before surgery and not as a sleep aid as Jackson used it, had gotten a bad name since it was ruled the main cause of Jackson's death.

But he testified it was an "outstanding drug" when administered in the right setting.

Shafer is expected to be the last prosecution witness as the involuntary manslaughter trial of Dr. Conrad Murray resumed in Los Angeles after a five-day break.

Murray, has admitted giving Jackson propofol as a sleep aid. But his attorneys have claimed Jackson gave himself an extra, fatal dose of the drug when Murray was out of the singer's bedroom.

Medical examiners determined Jackson's June 25, 2009, death resulted from an overdose of propofol combined with sedatives.

Shafer told jurors; "I am asked every day I'm in the operating room, I tell patients what I'm going to do and I am asked the question, 'Are you going to give me the drug that killed Michael Jackson?'"

Shafer, who teaches at Columbia University, said he is testifying without pay, in part because he wants to restore patients' faith in propofol when it is used in the correct circumstances.

"What has happened in this case has nothing to do with (patients') experience when they see a doctor for a procedure," Shafer said.

Previous prosecution witnesses have harshly criticized Murray for giving Jackson propofol at the singer's home and without sufficient monitoring and safety equipment.

The defense is expected to begin presenting its case on Friday. Murray, who has pleaded not guilty, faces a maximum sentence of four years in prison if convicted.

(Reporting by Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Jill Serjeant and Bill Trott)



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement

A Minute With: Zachary Quinto and his "Margin Call"

LOS ANGELES | Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:19am EDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Zachary Quinto, who made headlines this week when he said he was gay, is best known for playing Spock in the 2009's "Star Trek" and for his role as the evil Sylar on the recent TV series "Heroes."

The 34-year old actor has leveraged his fame to start his own production company, Before the Door Pictures, whose first film, "Margin Call" opens in theaters on Friday.

The film, in which Quinto also stars, boasts an all-star cast including Kevin Spacey, Jeremy Irons, Stanley Tucci and Demi Moore among many others. It takes place in an investment bank over a 24-hour period at the start of the 2008 financial crisis. Quinto spoke to Reuters about the film, reprising Spock for the "Star Trek" sequel and playing gay characters.

Q: You play a young analyst who discovers some serious information that causes major panic at the company. How did you decide which role you'd play?

A: "It was never a question because every other character was at least 10 years older. But I felt really drawn to the role, as well. Obviously the social relevance of the film drew me in, but there is something about the perspective and the compelling way in which the story is laid out. It invites the audience to have their own opinions. It generates dialogue."

Q: And you're also producing for the first time. Was it tough wearing both hats at once?

A: "I had to work hard (as a producer) to get the movie together before I could start focusing on my role. But once I did that, I immersed myself in my relationship with the character and it became about my work as an actor. My producing responsibilities waned a bit by that point, and I relied heavily on my producing partners on the day-to-day stuff."

Q: What made you decide that the time was right to become a multi-hyphenate?

A: "It was directly correlated to the rise of my career with 'Heroes' and 'Star Trek.' I decided to start the company after I was cast in that movie, but before it was announced. We were still eight months away from shooting it and another two years from it coming out. I saw very specifically that a window was open, but I knew it wouldn't stay open forever."

Q: Speaking of "Star Trek," what's happening with the sequel? You must've read the script and know.

A: "I do not. The script is in its final stages of being written, but they are sharing specific plot points so I only know what they've told me.

"I start prepping November 1st and we start (shooting) mid-January. I'll be training for a sequence in the movie which doesn't come in until later, so I'll keep training

Q: You're also back on TV in an upcoming two-part episode of the FX series "American Horror Story."

A: "Yes, then I'm going back to do a couple more I think before the end of the season. I play a gay ghost. It's basically like my (gay) character on (the former VH1 series) 'So NoTORIous' and my character from 'Heroes' mixed into one."

Q: Do you think playing gay roles could typecast you?

A: "No, I don't think so. I've played gay characters before. I've played straight characters before. It hasn't shaped my relationship to my work and they've all been interesting characters."

Q: What do you consider your big break?

A: "'Heroes' really changed the game for me in a way that nothing before it had. That job came out of a really lean period for me. I felt a lot of limitations and, of course, they were all self-imposed. And they were able to find an outlet in that role in 'Heroes' and that really changed my journey creatively and professionally."

Q: Then to have your first feature film be "Star Trek!"

A: "That was an unexpected next-level experience that changed the game even further than I ever thought it would. To be on a TV show with a steady gig for four years and earn a good living was as far ahead as I thought for myself. Getting launched into that whole other layer was incredible. And I think I've worked to make the most of it."

(Editing by Bob Tourtellotte and Patricia Reaney)



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement

McCartney ex-wife Heather Mills sued by hairdresser

LOS ANGELES | Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:42pm EDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Paul McCartney's ex-wife Heather Mills has been sued by a Los Angeles hairdresser who claims the former reality TV show contestant failed to pay as much as $80,000 as she pursued stardom in Hollywood.

David Miramontes, who works under the name David Paul, claims in the lawsuit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on Tuesday that he worked for Mills starting in 2005 and quit in 2008 after she repeatedly failed to pay him, saying she had no money until her divorce from the former Beatle was finalized.

Mills and McCartney ended their acrimonious marriage in 2008 and in December of that year, Mills began avoiding Miramontes. He prepared an invoice for $80,000, but it has yet to be paid. Miramontes charged as much as $5,000 per haircut for an out of office appointment, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit seeks payment plus punitive damages, court costs and attorney fees. Neither Mills, who resides in Great Britain and in New York, nor a representative for her could be reached late Tuesday.

Mills and McCartney were married in 2002 in a lavish ceremony in Ireland, but four years later they separated, blaming intrusion into their private lives. In their bitter divorce settlement, Mills was awarded 24.3 million pounds ($38 million) by a judge.

The former model, 43, performed on TV's "Dancing With the Stars" in 2007 despite having had her left leg amputated below her knee following a 1993 traffic accident. She was voted off the series in its sixth week.

McCartney remarried earlier this month to American heiress Nancy Shevell at a London register office.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel and Bob Tourtellotte; Editing by Zorianna Kit)



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement