Friday, June 17, 2011

"Green Lantern" emerges from obscurity; critics pounce

LOS ANGELES | Fri Jun 17, 2011 1:24am EDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - The universe has probably never been safer if the proliferation of comic book superheroes on the big screen is any indication.

Marvel adventures "Thor" and "X-Men: First Class" have sold nearly $800 million worth of tickets combined at the worldwide box office in recent weeks, and "Captain America" is getting ready for a July 22 release across North America.

Stepping into the breach Friday is "Green Lantern," starring Ryan Reynolds as the ring-wielding intergalactic space cop immortalized in D.C. comic books.

The $150 million Warner Bros. picture tells the story of Earth's first member of the Green Lantern Corps and his maiden task -- to beat back and defeat mega-villain Parallax, a planet-killing entity that thrives on fear.

Blake Lively co-stars as his love interest, while Peter Sarsgaard and Mark Strong are on board as villains.

The film's director, Martin Campbell, who rebooted the James Bond franchise with the gritty "Casino Royale," acknowledges that the "Green Lantern" is a lesser-known member of the D.C. comics pantheon, but so what?

"We had a little bit more work to do," Campbell told reporters recently. "It wasn't in as many people's consciousness as Superman or Batman may have been."

But "Iron Man was a second-tier (Marvel comics) character that turned out very well," he points out. "Whether a superhero is second-tier or first-tier is irrelevant ... The movie has to stand alone."

"CLUTTERED CHAOS"

Early "Green Lantern" reviews were overwhelmingly negative. The New York Observer said the film was "a dumb, pointless, ugly, moronic and incomprehensible jumble of botched effects, technical blunders and cluttered chaos."

In slightly more measured tones, Variety said the "visually lavish sci-fi adventure" was "a highly unstable alloy of the serious, the goofy and the downright derivative."

Still, bullish sources at Warner Bros. expect the film to gross at least $50 million during its first three days of release in the United States and Canada. That would put it in the same range as "X-Men: First Class," which opened to $55 million earlier this month and has grossed $104 million to date.

The critics were generally kind to Reynolds, who was last seen by a handful of people trying to escape a coffin in "Buried." He seemed a natural choice to play a character less riven by internal demons than recent movie superheroes have tended to be.

As hot-shot fighter pilot Hal Jordan, the 34-year-old Canadian actor -- who has a fear of flying -- lent a casual wisecracking charm to a guy given the modest challenge of saving the universe.

"A lot of the current iterations of superheroes are a little bit darker and serious in tone," Reynolds told reporters in a recent interview. "This is a bit of a throwback. There's a lot of fun in the character."

So much fun that there is inevitable talk of a sequel. Indeed, viewers who sit through the credits at the end will learn which character becomes a villain in the next episode.

Lively joked she'd like to play the villain next. Strong, who co-stars as Green Lantern Corps leader Sinestro, said he played up certain personality traits that might eventually push his character to the dark side -- as happened in the comics.

Those little teasers hint at the degree of thought that may have gone toward a second installment, even before the opening credits roll on the first.

But if a sequel does not get the green light, Reynolds will get a fresh crack at fanboy glory in yet another obscure comic-book adaptation headed to the big screen. He is attached to reprise the villainous role of Deadpool in a spin-off of the "X-Men: Wolverine" spin-off.

(Editing by Dean Goodman and Steve Gorman)



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Thursday, June 16, 2011

NY police to investigate Tupac robbery confession

NEW YORK | Thu Jun 16, 2011 1:46pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - New York police are investigating an online posting from a man who claims to have shot the late rapper Tupac Shakur during a robbery attempt in 1994, a police spokesman said on Thursday.

Convicted murderer Dexter Isaac claims to have been paid $2,500 by music manager James Rosemond to rob Shakur outside a Manhattan recording studio in November 1994, in which Shakur was shot five times.

Shakur survived the shooting but was later murdered in an unsolved 1996 shooting in Las Vegas.

Isaac is currently serving a life sentence in Brooklyn, New York, after having been convicted for charges including murder, fraud and robbery.

"Detectives plan to talk to him and hear what he has to say," police spokesman Paul Browne said Thursday.

Rosemond, a well-known manager of several high-profile artists, is currently a fugitive from federal authorities who allege he was involved in a large-scale cocaine trafficking enterprise.

Rosemond's lawyer, Jeffrey Lichtman, told Reuters Isaac was making up the story to help police build a case against Rosemond.

"This is not him being a good soldier or clearing his conscience. It's a desperate 17-year-old attempt to reduce his sentence," he said.

As proof, Isaac said he is still in possession of a chain necklace that he took from Shakur during the robbery.

He also claims in the posting to have information about the murders of Shakur in 1996 and another rapper, Christopher "Notorious B.I.G." Wallace in 1997, but did not elaborate.

The claim from Isaac was first posted on music website AllHipHop.com.

In the confession, Isaac said he is speaking out because Rosemond had accused him of being a government informant.

"Now I would like to clear up a few things, because the statute of limitations is over, and no one can be charged, and I'm just plain tired of listening to your lies."

(Reporting by Bernd Debusmann Jr., editing by Christine Kearney)



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Two in court over alleged plot against Joss Stone

Thomson Reuters is the world's largest international multimedia news agency, providing investing news, world news, business news, technology news, headline news, small business news, news alerts, personal finance, stock market, and mutual funds information available on Reuters.com, video, mobile, and interactive television platforms. Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.

NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. Nasdaq delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Charlie Sheen loses early round in "Men" lawsuit

LOS ANGELES | Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:57pm EDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A judge on Wednesday sent Charlie Sheen's lawsuit against Warner Bros to arbitration, in a ruling that denies the actor a public court hearing over his firing from hit sitcom "Two and a Half Men."

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Allan Goodman's ruling was seen as a victory for the studio behind the sitcom and for producer Chuck Lorre, who also was a target of Sheen's lawsuit after a bitter feud with the actor.

After taking a break from the show for drug rehabilitation following a wild party at his house, Sheen was fired in March from top-rated comedy sitcom "Two and a Half Men," which is produced by Warner Bros but airs on CBS.

Sheen, who claims in the suit that he was fired after criticizing producers, is seeking over $100 million in damages.

Goodman's ruling puts off the opportunity for Sheen to present his accusations in open court, which could save the parties involved from potential embarrassment.

The judge noted in his 21-page decision that Sheen's contract called for disputes to be referred to arbitration.

"We're very gratified by the court's ruling enforcing the parties' arbitration agreement," Warner Bros said in a statement.

In a public war of words with Lorre earlier this year, Sheen called the producer "a "stupid, stupid little man" and other derogatory, expletive-filled comments.

Lorre's attorney, Howard Weitzman, said in a statement that following the judge's ruling, "This matter will now proceed in an orderly fashion as the parties agreed to."

Marty Singer, an attorney for Sheen, said the arbitrator could still send the case back to be heard in open court.

"We feel very confident our client will prevail in the case," Singer said. "That's what matters at the end of the day, it's who wins and who loses, not who wins in the preliminary skirmishes."

(Editing by Dan Whitcomb and Greg McCune)



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials

Oscar mystery added to best picture race

LOS ANGELES | Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:25pm EDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Academy Awards organizers have introduced an element of mystery into next year's Oscar ceremony by deciding that anywhere between five and 10 movies will compete for the coveted best picture prize.

The actual number of nominees will not be revealed until nominations are announced on January 24.

The new rule, announced after a late-night board meeting on Tuesday, follows a decision two years ago to double the number of nominees to 10 in a bid to increase ratings.

That move seemed to work, as crowd-pleasing films such as "Inception," "The Blind Side" and "Up" got a shot at the top prize (although they did not win).

On the other hand, some Oscar observers complained that the expansion devalued the significance of a best picture nomination and allowed undeserving pictures to sneak onto the ballot.

"A best picture nomination should be an indication of extraordinary merit," said Bruce Davis, the executive director of the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences. "If there are only eight pictures that truly earn that honor in a given year, we shouldn't feel an obligation to round out the number."

In order to ensure a nomination under the new system, a picture will have to receive at least five percent of first-place votes.

The new system will pose a dilemma for the studios as they wonder how much money they should spend lobbying for a particular movie if the field is tightened.

On the other hand the "new twist" -- as the Academy described it -- will help the Oscars battle awards-season fatigue.

By the time the nominations are announced, front-runners have already emerged at ceremonies for the Critics Choice Movie Awards and the Golden Globes.

The 84th annual Academy Awards will be presented in Hollywood on February 26.

(Reporting by Dean Goodman; Editing by Dan Whitcomb)



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Settlement Statement | WordPress Tutorials